VERIFIED BRADY VIOLATION
Law enforcement testimony: State possessed mitigation evidence
Sergeant Ray Blackstock conviction: Document was in state custody before trial
Never disclosed to defense: Despite constitutional obligation
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT
Four false statements to jury in closing arguments
Prosecutor claimed: "There is no evidence supporting defendant's innocence"
While concealing the document that proved Adkins right
TIMELINE DESTRUCTION
Primary 2010 victim's testimony: Imperative 2009 — about January 2010 (victims minors)
Defense efforts: Failed to call fall 2009 as any context occurred after legal age
Forensically authenticated mitigation letter proves innocence
DOUBLE INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE
Trial counsel: Failed to subpoena letter despite explicit client instructions
Appellate counsel: Failed to present authenticated evidence
Trial counsel admitted failure under oath, appellate counsel's failure clear from record
🔴 WHY THIS CASE DEMANDS IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
100%100%658Constitutional ViolationsTimeline DestructionYears OldCancer Survivor
THE ASK: Kenneth Adkins needs your financial assistance in obtaining legal representation for his state habeas corpus proceedings.
This case presents documented prosecutorial suppression, law enforcement testimony confirming Brady violation, clear evidence of actual innocence, and urgent humanitarian concerns.
INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL CONTEXT
Kenneth Anthony Adkins was convicted in the Superior Court of Glynn County, Georgia (Case No. CR 16005S6-063), following a trial tainted by constitutional errors that prevented him from effectively presenting compelling evidence of his innocence. First, Mr. Adkins has consistently maintained his factual innocence, asserting that the allegations against him were based on a timeline fabricated by the State — a timeline critical to the charges of sexual abuse involving two underage teenagers, Anntwan Jones and Trinity Vann. Second, he has consistently maintained that he had no sexual contact with either at any time. As you will see below, the evidence fully supports Mr. Adkins' contentions.
We have been serving the community for over 50 years, providing a space for people to come together and connect with KENNETHADKINS.ORG. Our founders believed in the transformative power of faith, and we continue to hold that belief close to our hearts.
The State's theory rested entirely on the claim that sexual acts occurred prior to May 2010, when both Jones and Vann were under sixteen years of age. At trial, the State repeatedly emphasized a timeline allegory that Mr. Adkins had left his former church, First Jordan Grove Baptist Church, around May 2010 due to "financial problems" and had moved to a different church. The State argued this transition made it possible for the alleged acts to occur precisely when the victims were minors. However, newly discovered evidence—including Mr. Adkins' resignation letter from First Jordan Grove—conclusively demonstrates that Mr. Adkins did not resign from First Jordan Grove until May 23, 2010, and did not establish Greater Dimensions until after that date. This critical documentary evidence wholly contradicts the State's testimony regarding the timing and location of the alleged acts one true, these events would not have taken place before both Jones and Vann had already reached the legal age of consent.
Mr. Adkins diligently attempted to ensure that this critical resignation letter, which would have disproven the prosecution's asserted timeline, was presented at trial. He publically instructed his trial attorney to obtain and introduce this letter as evidence. Despite Mr. Adkins' clear requests and reliance on his attorney, this critical piece of exculpatory evidence was never acquired or presented at trial. Adding further injustice, the prosecution possessed the resignation letter but failed to disclose it to the defense as constitutionally required, instead presenting to the jury prejudicial testimony about Mr. Adkins' departure. The prosecutor and courts further compounding these errors, appellate counsel failed to adequately address these issues upon appeal, allowing the conviction to proceed effectively in spite of constitutional error—including Brady violations, prosecutorial misconduct, and ineffective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel—presented in Mr. Adkins' case.
Given the seriousness of these constitutional violations and the clear miscarriage of justice that has occurred, we need your help to retain a top Georgia Appellate Attorney to thoroughly review this matter and, if appropriate, to support Mr. Adkins in the compelling and filing of a comprehensive post-conviction petition.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.